GitHub delivery evidence
Build and verify the change with supported GitHub context.
One normalized catalog across AWS, GCP, and Azure. Filter by vCPU, memory, GPU, and purchase option, sort by price per resource, and read the GPU specs in place, then confirm the final number with the provider.
One connected loop, held on the stage this capability serves. The other stages stay as context so you can see what feeds in and what comes next.
Build and verify the change.
Build and verify the change with supported GitHub context.
Inspect delivery workflow activity in the connected release workspace.
Investigate test outcomes and flakiness evidence across runs.
Keep supported API contracts inspectable alongside release evidence.
Compare public cloud compute pricing as planning evidence.
Estimated monthly spend by service from on-demand catalog prices. The bars fill to each figure while the total counts up, so the widest bar shows where the money actually lands. Confirm the final number with the provider.
The actual monthly line draws in solid; the projection past now is dashed, so nothing pretends to be measured. A rising slope is a planning signal, not a bill.
projected spend
actual projectedDerived figures that count up to their estimated value, so a monthly number becomes a per-deploy and per-environment cost you can reason about. Every tile stays marked estimate.
Cost / deploy
~$42
monthly ÷ deploys
Cost / environment
~$1140/mo
across 6 envs
Cost / vCPU-hour
~$0.043
blended on-demand
Cost / GPU-hour
~$3.9
H100 on-demand
Every offer is normalized to the same row so a like-for-like compare is one glance. On-demand, spot, and reserved sit together per instance and region.
Providers, purchase options, operating systems, and GPU vendors are all filterable facets, so a comparison narrows fast.
Providers
Normalized together.
Purchase options
How you buy.
Operating systems
Priced per OS.
GPU vendors
Curated specs.
Architecture
CPU families.
Sort by
Value ratios.
An honest limit
This is a normalized reference index, not a purchasing path. Rows carry an indexed and price-effective date, GPU specs are curated per model rather than live from the feed, and final purchasing decisions belong with the provider.
3
providers normalized into one comparable catalog
Est.
figures only, confirm the final number with the provider
Spot
and on-demand pricing carried per instance and region
Per-row
price-effective and indexed timestamps on every row
A faster first pass, then confirm with the provider.